DAMPAK PERALIHAN FUNGSI KAWASAN HUTAN TERHADAP KONDISI SOSIAL EKONOMI MASYARAKAT (Studi Kasus: Kampung Lembur Pasir, Desa Ginanjar, Kecamatan Ciambar, Kabupaten Sukabumi, Jawa Barat)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31938/jns.v15i1.127Keywords:
The transition region functions, community, social and economic conditionsAbstract
Change region switch the function of limited production forest area of the reserve has implications for the shape of people's activities in the region are limited. This study aims to determine the impact of the transition Perhutani office production forests into conservation forest area of the National Park on the socioeconomic conditions of rural communities around the area hutan. Metode research is a case study where data collection is done by using questionnaires and in-depth interviews and analysis of descriptive data. The results showed the impact of transfer of forest land to the socio-economic conditions of rural communities around the forest area, the social aspects of a decline in the number of pengarap land and increasing types of livelihood (of 6 types to 13 types of livelihood) and from the economic aspect, noticeable decrease in the use of firewood by the head of each family as well as a decline in revenue on each head of family who make their livelihood as this penggarap. Implications for the various issues that arise in the community where it takes an intensive development program.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, S. 1979. Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta
Beyda, Iyon. 2001. Analisa Pendapatan Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus Pada Desa Kinnepen Di Kecamatan Munthe). Universitas Sumatera Utara: Medan
Departemen Kehutanan. 1986. Buku Informasi Taman Nasional Indonesia. Direktorat Taman Nasional dan Hutan Wisata. Departemen Kehutanan Bogor. Bogor.
Desa Ginanjar. 2012. Profil Desa Ginanjar, Kecamatan Ciambar, Kabupaten Sukabumi, Jawa Barat.
Haeruman, Anwar 2005. dampak sosial ekonomi pelaksanaan PHBM di RPH Buniwangi BKPH palabuha ratu KPH sukabumi perum perhutani unit iii jawa barat. Universitas Nusa Bangsa, Bogor
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Jaringan (KBBI Online). Tersedia: http://kbbi.web.id/. (20 Desember 2013)
Mubyarto. 1991. Hutan, Perladangan dan Pertanian Masa Depan. PT. Aditya Media. Yogyakarta
Najir, M. 1988. Metode Penelitian. Ghaida Indonesia. Jakarta.
Nur, yuyun. 1993. Dampak Negatif Akibat Pengunjung Terhadap Vegetasi Alami Pada Jalur Antara Penyangga Puncak Gunung Gede di Taman Nasional Gunung Gede Pangrango. Universitas Nusa Bangsa. Bogor
Purwanto. 2011. Fpemangku kepentingan Yang Mempengarui Masyarakat Menggarap Lahan Di Hutan Lindung (Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan, Vol 8, Nomor 4, Desembar 2011). Badan Penellitian Dan Pengembangan Kehutanan, Bogor. Resor Pasir Hantap. 2014. Profil Resor Pasir Hantap. Sukabumi.
Sayogyo. 1977. Garis Kemiskinan dan Kebutuhan Minimum Tangan Lembaga Penelitian Sosial Pedesaan. IPB. Bogor
Sinaga R dan White. 1979. Beberapa aspek kelembagaan di Pedesaan Jawa dan Hubungan dengan Kemiskinan Struktural, dalam Kemiskinan Struktural. Alfian et al. Edisi Jakarta
Sholeh, A. Z. 2005 Ilmu Statistika Pendekatan Teoritis dan Aplikasi Disertai Contoh Penggunaan SPSS. Cetakan Ke – 1. Rekayasa Suns. Bandung
Undang – Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kehutanan
Winarto, Bambang. 2012. Kamus Rimbawan. Inter Aksara Prima.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1970 Aldo Pratama, Poltak BP Panjaitan, Abdul Rahman Rusli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
